Optimum Basin Management Program

 

Chino Basin Dry-Year Yield Program

Modeling Report

 

Volume III

 

July, 2003

 

  SECTION

REPORT TEXT

SIZE

 

Outside Cover

0.23Mb

 

Inside Cover, Table of Contents, List of Tables, List of Figures, Acronyms

0.32Mb

1

Introduction

0.15Mb

2

Geology and Hydrogeology

0.27Mb

3

Groundwater Quality

0.31Mb

4

Conceptual Model

0.20Mb

5

Model Description

0.21Mb

6

Model Calibration

0.17Mb

7

Dry-Year Yield Program Impacts

0.25Mb

8

References

0.16Mb

Appendix A

Comparison of Groundwater Model Projected Time Histories at Wells for the Calibration Period

1.3Mb

Appendix B

Groundwater Model Projected Time Histories at Wells for Baseline Scenario

1.3Mb

Appendix C

Groundwater Model Projected Time Histories at Wells for the Dry-Year Yield Scenario

1.2Mb

Appendix D

Planning Information Prepared By Black & Veatch Asset Inventory and Water Supply Plans for Producers Participating in the Dry Year Yield Program

0.16Mb

 

 

 

TABLE NO.

TABLES

SIZE

4-1

Subsurface Inflow Boundary Conditions for 2003 Watermaster Model

0.11Mb

4-2

Time History of Annual Stormwater Recharge in Chino Basin Recharge Facilities, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.11Mb

4-3

Time History of Deep Percolation of Precipitation and Applied Water by 2003 Basin Plan Management Zones, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.11Mb

4-4

Time History of Supplemental Water Recharge in the Chino Basin, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.11Mb

4-5a

Estimate of Annual Evapotranspiration by Riparian Vegetation in the Lower Chino Basin

0.11Mb

4-5b

Estimate of Monthly Distribution of Evapotranspiration by Riparian Vegetation in the Lower Chino Basin

0.11Mb

4-6

Time History of Chino Basin and Temescal Basin Groundwater Production

0.11Mb

6-1

Comparison of Model-Predicted and Observed Santa Ana River Discharge at Prado Dam, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

6-2a

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Chino North, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

6-2b

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Chino East, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

6-2c

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Chino South, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

6-2d

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Prado Basin, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

6-2e

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Temescal, 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

6-3

Model-Estimated Inflows, Outflows and Rising Water Contributions to the Santa Ana River for the Prado Basin Management Zone 1989/90 to 2000/01

0.38Mb

7-1

Recycled Water Discharge Projections Used in Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios

0.37Mb

7-2

Total Chino Basin Production, Watermaster Replenishment Requirement, and Replenishment Plan that Balances Recharge and Discharge for Baseline Scenario

0.37Mb

7-3a

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Chino North, Baseline Period 2004/05 to 2028/29

0.37Mb

7-3b

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Chino East, Baseline Period 2004/05 to 2028/29

0.37Mb

7-3c

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Chino South, Baseline Period 2004/05 to 2028/29

0.37Mb

7-3d

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Prado Basin, Baseline Period 2004/05 to 2028/29

0.37Mb

7-3e

Estimated Hydrologic Budget for the Chino Basin by RWQCB Management Zone Temescal, Baseline Period 2004/05 to 2028/29

0.38Mb

7-4

Model-Estimated Inflows, Outflows and Rising Water Contributions to the Santa Ana River for the Prado Basin Management Zone 2004/05 to 2028/29

0.37Mb

7-5

Comparison of Projected Annual Time Histories of Santa Ana River Discharge at Prado Dam for Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios

0.37Mb

 

 

 

FIGURE NO.

FIGURES

SIZE

2-1

Chino Basin and Other Surrounding Groundwater Basins

1.7Mb

2-2

Base of Freshwater Aquifer Including Bedrock Type

1.8Mb

2-3

Groundwater Elevation Map Fall 2000

1.8Mb

2-4

Chino Basin Hydrogeology Areas of Subsidence and Historical Artesian Conditions

1.7Mb

2-5

Water-Level Time Histories (Non-Pumping) at City of Chino Hills Wells 1A and 1B

69Kb

2-6

Map View of Geologic Cross-Sections Chino Basin

1.7Mb

2-7

Cross-Section A-A

0.37Mb

2-8

Cross-Section B-B

0.43Mb

2-9

Cross-Section C-C

0.47Mb

2-10

Cross-Section D-D

0.39Mb

2-11

Cross-Section E-E

0.36Mb

2-12

Cross-Section F-F

0.41Mb

2-13

Cross-Section H-H

0.40Mb

2-14

Cross-Section J-J

0.41Mb

2-15

Average Specific Yield of Sediments Layer 1

1.7Mb

2-16

Average Specific Yield of Sediments Layer 2

1.7Mb

2-17

Average Specific Yield of Sediments Layer 3

1.7Mb

2-18

Well Index Map Water-Level Time Histories

1.7Mb

2-19

Water-Level Time Histories at Wells in Management Zone 1

0.11Mb

2-20

Water-Level Time Histories at Wells in Management Zone 2

0.10Mb

2-21

Water-Level Time Histories at Wells in Management Zone 3

0.10Mb

2-22

Water-Level Time Histories at Wells in Management Zone 4

85Kb

2-23

Water-Level Time Histories at Wells in Management Zone 5

85Kb

3-1

Well Location Map, Chino Basin and Vicinity: Wells with Water Quality Data from 1997 through 2002

13.3Mb

3-2

TDS in Groundwater, Average Concentration (pre-1980)

6.7Mb

3-3

TDS in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1981 to 1996)

6.6Mb

3-4

TDS in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.8Mb

3-5

Nitrate-N in Groundwater, Average Concentration (pre-1980)

6.8Mb

3-6

Nitrate-N in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1981 to 1996)

6.6Mb

3-7

Nitrate-N in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

1.9Mb

3-8

Water Character Index in Groundwater (1997 to 2002)

6.7Mb

3-9

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.4Mb

3-10

Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.5Mb

3-11

1,1-Dichloroethene in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.4Mb

3-12

1,2-Dichloroethane in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.4Mb

3-13

cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.4Mb

3-14

1,2,3-Trichloropropane in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.7Mb

3-15

1,2,3-Trichloropropane in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002), Expanded Class Intervals

6.7Mb

3-16

Arsenic in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.5Mb

3-17

Manganese in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.4Mb

3-18

Perchlorate in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.4Mb

3-19

Radon in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.3Mb

3-20

Gross Alpha in Groundwater, Average Concentration (1997 to 2002)

6.5Mb

3-21

Location of Known Contamination Sources and Related Water Quality Anomalies

6.2Mb

4-1

Location of Subsurface Boundary Inflows and Stream Segments that Are Dynamically Linked to the Groundwater System

1.7Mb

4-2

Management Zones Used in the 2003 Basin Plan

6.2Mb

4-3

Location of Precipitation Stations and Drainage Area Configuration in the Chino Area Used in the Chino Basin Model

6.3Mb

4-4

SCS Hydrologic Soil Types in the Chino Area Used in the Chino Basin Model

7.3Mb

4-5

1993 Land Uses in the Chino Area Used in the Chino Basin Model

7.5Mb

4-6

Water Service Area Boundaries for the Chino Basin Area

6.6Mb

4-7

Distribution of Riparian Vegetation in the Lower Chino Basin

5.2Mb

4-8

Location of Wells that Produced Water During the Period 1989/90 to 2000/01

6.6Mb

5-1

Relationship of Models, Input Data and Output Data

33Kb

5-2

Characterization of Calibration Period to Long-term Climatic Trends

70Kb

5-3

Model Grid

1.5Mb

5-4

Location of Effective and Ineffective Cells for Layer 1

1.5Mb

5-5

Location of Effective and Ineffective Cells for Layer 2

1.5Mb

5-6

Location of Effective and Ineffective Cells for Layer 3

1.5Mb

5-7

Stream Representation in MODFLOW and WLAM

1.8Mb

5-8

Initial Groundwater Elevations at Start of Calibration Period Fall 1989

1.7Mb

6-1

Location of Wells and Prado Dam Gaging Station Used in Model Calibration

1.6Mb

6-2

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Fontana Water Company No. 3A

83Kb

6-3

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Cucamonga County Water District No. 30

88Kb

6-4

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Ontario No. 17

80Kb

6-5

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Upland No. 3

80Kb

6-6

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Monte Vista No. 10

82Kb

6-7

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Pomona No. 11

80Kb

6-8

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Chino No. 9

83Kb

6-9

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Chino Hills No. 18A

82Kb

6-10

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for CIM No. 4

84Kb

6-11

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for JCSD No. 16

80Kb

6-12

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for Norco No. 11

81Kb

6-13

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for a Private Well Parente ARC

79Kb

6-14

Comparison of Model Predicted Groundwater Level and Observed Groundwater Level for a Private Well Excelsior

82Kb

6-15a

Model Projected Groundwater Elevations at End of Calibration Period for Layer 1 Fall 2001

1.7Mb

6-15b

Model Projected Groundwater Elevations at End of Calibration Period for Layer 2 Fall 2001

1.7Mb

6-15c

Model Projected Groundwater Elevations at End of Calibration Period for Layer 3 Fall 2001

1.6Mb

6-16a

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of Calibration Period for Layer 1 Fall 1988 to Fall 2001

1.7Mb

6-16b

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of Calibration Period for Layer 2 Fall 1988 to Fall 2001

1.7Mb

6-16c

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of Calibration Period for Layer 3 Fall 1988 to Fall 2001

1.7Mb

6-17a

Comparison of Model-Projected and Observed Santa Ana River Discharge Time Histories at Prado Dam Histogram

74Kb

6-17b

Comparison of Model-Projected and Observed Santa Ana River Discharge Time Histories at Prado Dam Regression Plot

80Kb

6-18a

Final Aquifer Properties, Hydraulic Conductivity in Layer 1

1.6Mb

6-18b

Final Aquifer Properties, Hydraulic Conductivity in Layer 2

1.6Mb

6-18c

Final Aquifer Properties, Hydraulic Conductivity in Layer 3

1.6Mb

6-19a

Final Aquifer Properties, Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity in Layer 1

1.6Mb

6-19b

Final Aquifer Properties, Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity in Layer 2

1.6Mb

6-19c

Final Aquifer Properties, Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity in Layer 3

1.6Mb

6-20a

Final Aquifer Properties, Specific Yield in Layer 1

1.6Mb

6-20b

Final Aquifer Properties, Specific Yield in Layer 2

1.6Mb

6-20c

Final Aquifer Properties, Specific Yield in Layer 3

1.6Mb

6-21

Time History of Total Storage in the Chino Basin, Fall 1989 to Fall 2001

65Kb

6-22

Comparison of Model Projected and Observed Santa Ana River Discharge at Prado

73Kb

7-1

Comparison of Annual Groundwater Pumping for Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios

72Kb

7-2a

Groundwater Levels at End of Baseline Scenario for Layer 1 Fall 2028

1.8Mb

7-2b

Groundwater Levels at End of Baseline Scenario for Layer 2 Fall 2028

1.8Mb

7-2c

Groundwater Levels at End of Baseline Scenario for Layer 3 Fall 2028

1.8Mb

7-3a

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of Baseline Scenario for Layer 1 2004 to 2028

1.8Mb

7-3b

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of Baseline Scenario for Layer 1 2004 to 2028

1.8Mb

7-3c

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of Baseline Scenario for Layer 2 2004 to 2028

1.8Mb

7-4

Estimated Location of Water Quality Anomalies in 2004 and their Projected Locations in 2028 for Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios

5.9Mb

7-5

Projected Annual Time History of Santa Ana River Discharge at Prado Dam for the Baseline Scenario

69Kb

7-6

Location of New Wells in the Dry-Year Yield Program and OBMP Desalter Wells

1.7Mb

7-7a

Groundwater Levels at End of the Dry-Year Yield Scenario for Layer 1 Fall 2028

1.8Mb

7-7b

Groundwater Levels at End of the Dry-Year Yield Scenario for Layer 2 Fall 2028

1.8Mb

7-7c

Groundwater Levels at End of the Dry-Year Yield Scenario for Layer 3 Fall 2028

1.8Mb

7-8a

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of the Dry-Year Yield Scenario for Layer 1 2004 to 2028

1.8Mb

7-8b

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of the Dry-Year Yield Scenario for Layer 2 2004 to 2028

1.8Mb

7-8c

Change in Groundwater Level from Start to End of the Dry-Year Yield Scenario for Layer 3 2004 to 2028

1.8Mb

7-9a

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 1 at 2028

1.9Mb

7-9b

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 2 at 2028

1.9Mb

7-9c

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 2 at 2028

1.9Mb

7-10a

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 1 at Point of Maximum Storage 2007

1.7Mb

7-10b

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 2 at Point of Maximum Storage 2007

1.7Mb

7-10c

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 3 at Point of Maximum Storage 2007

1.7Mb

7-11a

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 1 after three-Year Extraction period 2018

1.7Mb

7-11b

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 2 after three-Year Extraction period 2018

1.7Mb

7-11c

Difference in Groundwater Levels Between Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios for Layer 3 after three-Year Extraction period 2018

1.7Mb

7-12

Projected Time History of Total Storage in the Chino Basin for Baseline and Dry-Year Yield Scenarios

68Kb